[…]we came across a cool web site that you might appreciate. Take a appear in the event you want[…]

[…]one of our guests lately advised the following website[…]

[…]Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine some unrelated information, nevertheless definitely worth taking a search, whoa did a single discover about Mid East has got more problerms as well […]

On top of using Emsisoft Anti-Malware and the Online Armor firewall I always surf in a virtual space which gets emptied when I close my browser. Only what I choose to save gets transferred to my hard drive, the rest is gone.

The program can be used for free, but upgrading to the paid version lets you have it do a few things automatically which makes it a bit easier, even though both offer the same protection.

This works so well that some users of it don’t even have any anti-malware on their machines, but the developer does not recommend that because sporadically a malware appears that is capable of escaping the virtual space -the sanbox as it is called- and gets on your hard disk anyway. But rarely, and he always finds a solution to it. It might happen a few times a year that such a particular malware appears, so chances that you get infected by just that particular malware out of the zillion are nearly nil. But just to make sure he recommends using anti-malware anyway,

The program -which I have used for some 8 years now, always having kept my laptops clean- is called Sandboxie. They have a very helpful and active forum as well.

Check it out: Sandboxie.

but what does the law breaker say?…. and this applies equally to any “My rights vs Public safety” argument be it internet safety gun safety or even Nuclear arms…

does he quiver in his boots “Oh no, I can’t illegally use this gun/bomb/malware anymore for my illegal desires” or does he say “GOOD, now no one can stop me from using my illegal gun/bomb/malware because to overpower/overpower/detect me is illegal”

Just as gun laws only prevent law abiding citizens from using guns… laws against malware will have no effect on the status quo, criminals who already cannot legally own a gun use them in their crimes (posted no gun areas are actually saying “come rob us, we cannot protect ourselves without going to jail longer than you will go IF you are caught. we WILL be caught but you got a 80% chance of getting away with robbing and even harming us”) and the only way to get evidence against malware users is that very malware that if illegal will mean only law breakers will have the tools needed to catch the law breakers

now the way it is implimented has a great deal to be desired but because it is a moral issue, a mind set issue, we need to go to a time when the dollar wasn’t the get out of jail card that it is today. when integrity meant something and cronyism was nonexistent. there was a time when a committee would say, look there – that is a person we would like to lead our country!… George Washington was offered to be King of the United States of America… but his own integrity prevented him from accepting. now days offer a politician $100 thousand dollars and you got his ear… unless that politician already has way more than you are offering… thus the reason that millionaires are such a threat to the political machine…. you cant bribe a billionaire with a couple million dollars

we should be looking for integrity instead of new laws. we need leaders with a moral compass not new laws that law breakers are already breaking. Don’t ask me to be your leader, I’m so on the verge of saying let them kill each other. the only good perv is a dead perv. and so many other cliches

but i say give everyone the malware and then tell me how many people will be able to get away with using it for nefarious reasons!

of course not